What this information shows

This page shows information collected through a staged coding process. Data collected on each campaign includes the campaign goal, target, group and outcome.

No information? Add some below

Campaign Characteristics

Campaign target:

Campaign goal:

Outcome:

Not stated

Undersea ethane pipeline

Unsuccessful

Evidence for outcome assessment

Outcome stated on group website - http://www.ppcc.org.au/campaignd.htm#n4

Campaign Description

This information was obtained in the year and from the location described in the relevant data fields. Details of how the data was acquired and the methodology for ascertaining campaign outcomes is available to download at the link. Do you have more information to add? Fill out the form below.

Major Campaign No. 5: Ethane Pipeline across Port Phillip. Click on a blue hyperlink of interest, or 1973 Supreme Court case, 2008 pipeline rupture, 2010 Federal Court cases.

* The route of the pipeline above was opposed because it was:
An ad hoc decision to introduce an industrial facility into a large natural area not previously industrialized, and one made in the total absence of any provision or forethought about the need to create a safe, accessible common pipelines corridor around Melbourne, and
The foreshore reserves and seabed of Port Phillip should not be disrupted on such a scale for commercial or industrial purposes.

* See details of this early PPCC campaign on the Kingston Council history website.

* Read the December 1973 judgement of the Supreme Court of Victoria that found that the Victorian Government had exceeded its lawful powers by charging a legitimate user of the public foreshore reserve with trespass, ordering him to move, and arresting him, in order to facilitate the digging up of part of the reserve to bury the private pipeline underneath it, and that a magistrate had wrongly convicted him. Justice Sir John Norris, In his written judgement, cited the landmark 1959 High Court of Australia case on public land of Randwick Corporation vs. Rutledge.

* The person ultimately ruled by Victoria’s Supreme Court to be the legitimate user was the inaugural President of the Port Phillip Conservation Council, John Iggulden, who was arrested and removed from the site by police, temporarily placed in custody, and placed on a good behaviour bond by a magistrate. His appeal to the Supreme Court led to his total vindication, and the Court found that he should not have been interfered with. The Government did not appeal against the Norris judgement.

* A nearby part of the foreshore is named the Peter Scullin Reserve, after a then Mordialloc councillor that prominently opposed the pipeline route.

* In December 2008, a ship’s anchor ruptured the ethane pipeline, causing damage of more than 100 million dollars, and cessation of ethane flow until March 2009.

* In March 2010, a Federal Court judgement criticized the Port of Melbourne Corporation and a Port Phillip sea pilot over the disaster.

* In June 2010, a second Federal Court judgement found against both the owner of the pipeline and the owner of the ship. (source from website http://www.ppcc.org.au/campaignd.htm#n4 11/11/2021)

Organising group website

Year begun:

Campaign Issue:

Organising group:

Geographic sphere:

Location:

Year outcome assessed:

1972

Conservation & Protection

Port Phillip Conservation Council

Local

Port Philip, Victoria

2018

What do these categories mean? Click here to download our methodology.